How To Price Your Warrants

One of the tricky aspects of structuring a private security offering is how to price your warrants, i.e. your equity give-up. The answer (in short): As much as it takes.

There is a price at which your transaction will clear the market.  A price that you pay in equity dilution and the price investors receive for the risk they are accepting.

When you go to market with a private placement, do the math upfront to make sure i) you’re providing your investors with an appropriate return, and ii) that you’re not giving away too much equity. To do that, there are six basic steps:

  1. Determine a base case forecast for the business.
  2. Determine the structure and terms (except for the actual warrant position) of the security you are issuing.
  3. Determine the expected enterprise value at the end of the investment horizon.
  4. Determine the equity value at the end of the investment horizon.
  5. Determine the dollar amount required that results in the targeted IRR.
  6. Divide the result you get in step 5 above by the result in step 4. That quotient results in the percent of equity you will need to make available for your investors.

Let’s walk through an example with real numbers so you can see how this all comes together. But first, some assumptions to frame the example:

  • You are acquiring a business for $5 million, or 4x the business’s EBITDA of $1.25MM;
  • You’ve arranged bank financing of $3MM;
  • You are able to invest $500 thousand of your own money;
  • The financing gap is $1.5MM; and,
  • Your investors will require a 30% IRR.

First you need to determine what your base case is for the business over the next five years. What will you be able to grow the EBITDA to over the next five years – the investment horizon? Lets assume for this illustration that you will be able to grow your business to $1.8MM in five years. Or approximately 7.6% compounded annual growth rate. We’ll also assume that at the end of five years that you’ll still have debt outstanding of $1.2MM (you may have borrowed more to grow your business), and cash of $100K.

Second, you’ll need to determine the terms and structure of the security you will be issuing to your investors (yes, you are issuing a security). Again for illustration purposes, we’ll assume that you will be issuing Preferred stock (the ‘why’ is beyond the scope of this article) in the amount of $1.95MM.

If you’ve noticed that the Preferred issuance is $1.95MM, and not $1.5MM, it’s not a typo. The reason you are issuing $1.95MM is because you, the Sponsor of the transaction, will be investing $450K of your $500K investment alongside the investors. The remaining $50K of your investment will go in as common.

This Preferred issuance will have a five-year maturity, will pay an 8% dividend in cash each year, and will have warrants for some percentage of the common equity of the business; again, the question is how much of the equity?

So, lets look at the math:

– Year 5 enterprise value (or terminal value) is equal to EBITDA times your exit multiple. Lets assume that there is no multiple expansion, so that the 4x you paid for the business is the same multiple for the terminal value. The terminal value $1.8MM x 4, or $7.2MM.

– Equity value is enterprise value, less debt, less preferred, plus cash (unrestricted cash). Therefore, equity value is equal to $7.2MM less $1.2MM (debt), less $1.95MM (preferred), plus $100K (cash), or $4.15MM.

– The IRR your investors are targeting is 30%. Since the investors are receiving 8% of their return in cash dividends, 22% of their return needs to come from the increase in equity value. The math then is $1.95MM (the face amount of the Preferred), times 1.22^5 (that’s 1 plus the 22% in IRR required from the equity build up to the power of 5, which is the maturity of the Preferred). Doing this math results in $1.95 x 2.7027, or $5.27MM.

– From the $5.27MM we subtract the face amount of the Preferred (return the initial investment) of $1.95MM and end up with $3.32MM of equity value that the Preferred investors need to receive in order to receive a 30% IRR (including the Preferred dividend payments of 8%).

– Finally, since we already determined that the expected terminal equity value is $4.15MM, then the Preferred Stock Issuance should end up with 80% of the equity in your transaction in the form of warrants – $3.32MM divided by $4.15MM.

– The remaining 20% of the equity goes to the common equity holder.

So what is the math to you, the Sponsor?

Since $450K of your investment went into the transaction as Preferred, you share in the returns of all the Preferred investors. Your share of the 80% of the equity to the Preferred Shareholders is 23.08% ($450/$1950), or $766K.

Next, since you are the sole common equity holder – the $50K of your total $500K investment – the remaining $830K of equity value ($4.15 – $3.32MM) goes to you for an IRR of approximately 75% (($830/50)^(.2)).

In all, you tripled your money for a blended IRR of 26% – (($766+$830)/$500)^(.2).

There you have it. Pricing your warrants on the back of an envelop in six easy steps.

Using Warrants In Your Private Offering

If you’re in the market raising junior capital through a private offering, you will need to understand how warrants are used in structuring your offering. If you are floating a Private Placement of preferred stock or subordinated debt, your investors will expect to have warrants attached to their security.

What is a warrant?

A warrant is a security that gives the warrant holder the right to purchase equity at a specific price, within a certain time frame. Without the warrants, the investor or lender would only receive the dividend yield or interest rate on his shares or loan, hardly compensating him for the risk of making the investment. This equity-kicker is what gets investors excited.

Warrants are usually expressed as a percentage of the “fully-diluted” common stock of the company, which then equates to a certain number of common equity shares.

Fully-diluted refers to the total number of shares that would be outstanding if all conversions take place; e.g. convertible securities, employee stock options, and warrants, including the warrants which are part of your offering.

Warrants will usually have a “nominal” exercise price, also known as “penny warrants”. In the context of a buyout where the majority of the equity capital is in the form of preferred, the common equity will only have a nominal value. In other situations, the common equity may be valued at a higher number in which case i) the warrants will have an exercise price at the market value of the common equity, or ii) the warrants will have a nominal price, but the number warrant shares will be less.

As you structure your transaction and write your Private Placement Memorandum, you should become familiar with some terms that you’ll need to include in your term sheet:

Anti-dilution rights protect the warrant holder from equity dilution from a subsequent issuance of shares at a price lower than what the investor originally paid.

A simple example – suppose an investor received warrants for 20% of the equity for a preferred investment $1 million. If the Issuer subsequently issued another $1 million of preferred with warrants for 30% of the equity, the first investor would be diluted from 20% equity to 14% equity if there were not any anti-dilution protection language.

There are a number of ways to address anti-dilution, but that discussion is beyond the scope of this article.

Demand and piggyback registration rights refer to the right of the warrant holder to register his warrant shares for public issuance. The difference between the two types of registration rights is that Demand registration allows the holder to initiate the registration of warrant shares for public issuance. Demand registration is usually reserved for majority warrant holders, or warrant holders who have a significant ownership. Piggyback registration means that the warrant holder may have his warrant shares registered along with another holder or the company if there is a registering of the company’s shares. Piggyback rights are for the benefit of minority investors, as only the majority investors will have Demand registration rights.

Tag-along rights give a shareholder the right to join in a transaction to sell his shares if another shareholder is selling his stake.

Preemptive rights give shareholders the right to purchase new securities being issued by the company prior to them being issued to new, outside investors. In the dilution example above, a preemptive right would have given the first investor the right to purchase a proportional amount of the new issuance to preserve their equity ownership.

Note: since there would be an anti-dilution provision in the shareholders agreement, the anti-dilution provision would require waiver by the shareholders to proceed with the new issuance.

A Put Option allows the warrant holder to “put” the warrant back to the company. When the warrant is put to the company, the company has an obligation to purchase the warrant back from the investor. It is a way for the investor to monetize the value of his equity stake. The price that the company pays for the warrant is the product of the equity value of the company and the percent of the fully-diluted equity represented by the warrant shares.

A Call Option is a way for the company to “call” in the claims on its common equity. A company may call its equity back from investors if it anticipates an increase in the value of its equity down the road. It is also a way for the company to consolidate ownership back to, say the sponsors of the transaction.

I had a situation once where an investor requested that we eliminate the Call Option. His rationale was that he wanted to ride the value and did not the equity value get called away from him.

There are no rules for the number of years for the investor to have its Put right, or the Issuer to have its Call right, except that typically the advantage is to the investor with the Put right occurring before the Call right. My experience is that Put/Call rights will usually occur in years 4/5 or 5/6.

The issue you will face will be determining the value of the equity if and when the Put or Call gets exercised (except if there is a sale of the company to an unrelated third party).

I have been in transactions where the equity value for the purposes of the warrant was negotiated upfront as the greater of i) a liquidity event (such as a sale) or ii) a formula.

For example, if the original transaction was valued at 5x EBITDA, then the valuation for the Put/Call was also 5x EBITDA. Keep in mind that the product of a multiple and EBITDA gets you to an Enterprise Value, which is not the same thing as the equity value. To get to equity value, you’ll need to subtract debt and add cash (unrestricted cash).

My experience is that if there is no predetermined formula, the value of the warrant is usually negotiated. The “fair market value as determined by a …” language is for when you can’t agree; however, you should always have this language even if you have a formula.

As the Issuer you may find that the formula is based on the just-ended fiscal year, but by the time the audit gets completed, there might have been a material adverse change in the business such that the agree-upon formula overstates the value of the equity. Conversely, if you are the investor, events subsequent to the audit may point to a significantly higher equity value than what would be indicated following a formula using the year-end numbers.

Warrants are just another tool that help you raise the capital you need. The trickiest part of the whole warrant conversation will be anti-protection. As the Issuer you will want to run through a variety of scenarios to make sure you understand how your value will be impacted when anti-dilution triggers kick in.

Why A Private Placement Memorandum

Why would you need to draft a Private Placement Memorandum? Where do you go for capital if you run or own a private company? There are several sources of capital for privately held businesses. One is the capital generated internally by judiciously managing the company’s working capital. Another source is your local bank, which is the one the primary financing vehicles for private companies. And of course, there is always the owner’s pocket.

But where do you go if your capital needs outstrip what is available from a bank, especially if your company is in need of permanent capital to fund long term growth objectives, capitalize a start-up, or finance an acquisition? If you do not have the wherewithal to write checks yourself, you will need to raise outside capital.

Junior Capital
Junior capital is a term used to describe capital that sits below bank debt, and includes mezzanine, or subordinated, debt, and equity. Sources of junior capital include institutional investors, such as insurance companies, hedge funds, private equity funds, mezzanine funds and SBICs.

Individual Investors
Another source of junior capital is individual investors. This class of investor includes friends, family, and high net worth individuals. And if you are issuing securities to individual investors, you may be required by law to write and distribute a private placement memorandum to each of your potential investors.

Protect Yourself Against Securities Fraud Claims
Besides the compliance issues, there are two major reasons for preparing a Private Placement Memorandum. First is to give you cover against securities fraud claims. By writing and delivering a PPM, you are establishing a record of what has been communicated to the investors about the offering and the company. When issuing securities, state and federal law is most concerned with securities fraud issues. Anti-fraud requirements call for the issuer to not make any unture statements of a material fact, or to leave out a material fact, the absence of which would make any statements made misleading; i.e. the issuer must disclose all relevant and material facts of the issuance and the company. A well-prepared PPM will establish a record of the information presented to investors, and will provide a level of protection for the company and issuer against claims of securities fraud.

Professional Image
The other reason for writing a Private Placement Memorandum is that it presents a professional face to the issuance. The image presented to investors by presenting a document that is well-prepared is one of professionalism and competency. Approaching sophisticated investors with a poorly drafted offering document will scream “unprofessional”, “novice”, “don’t know what they’re doing” – the exact opposite of what you are trying to project.

There are many reasons to use a PPM. And now with the availability of PPM templates, the upfront costs of using a PPM are manageable.

Contents Of A Private Placement

Now that you have made the decision to use a Private Placement Memorandum, what goes in it? The main concern of State and Federal securities laws are the protection of the investor. In this context, there is one cardinal rule – tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This means do not misrepresent material facts, and do not omit material facts where the inclusion of such facts would lead the prospective investor to a different conclusion.

Aside from being truthful and factual, your PPM should provide your prospective investor with all the information necessary to make an intelligent investment decision. It is common sense – put yourself in the investor’s shoes and think about what information you would like to have.

And, while the required disclosure will vary depending on various factors, such as size of the offering and whether there are non-accredited investors, I recommend erring on the side of caution. You may run afoul of securities laws by not having the right disclosure, but there is no harm if you “over-disclose”.

The following includes some of the sections that should be included in your Private Placement Memorandum:

• Notices to Investors: The Notice to Investors section includes federal and state disclosure legends, providing certain notices to prospective investors informing them that the securities described in the PPM are not registered. Additionally, some states have specific disclosure language they will require over and above the federal disclosures.

• Summary of Terms: The Summary of Terms provides a summary of the “deal”; i.e. purpose of the transaction, who the Issuer is, what type of security is being issued, specific terms of the security being issued (dividends or interest; current pay or accrued; warrants; collateral), affirmative and negative covenants, conditions precedent,  etc.

• Risk Factors: This section sets forth the risks specific to the Issuer and the risks of investing in the type of securities being issued. Some examples include reliance on customer concentration, cyclicality, inability to achieve projections, changes in regulations, etc.

• Conflicts of Interest: The conflict of interest section identifies and describes potential conflicts of interest of the Issuer, and its principals or affiliates. As an example, one of the principles may provide accounting services for the Issuer, or one of the principles may be a significant customer of the Issuer.

• Description of the Issuer, its Business and the Business Plan: Describes the business of the Issuer including its products, strategy, customers, sales and marketing, operations, industry and competitive analysis, and discussion of management.

• Transaction Description: The transaction section describes the transaction, including a schematic of the deal, sources and uses table and capitalization.

• Financial Information: This section includes presentation of historical financial performance as well as discussion and analysis of the results. The financial information section will also include management forecasts and relevant assumptions behind the forecast.

• Misc Sections: These sections will typically comprise of tax matters, and a description of the capital stock of the Issuer.

• Subscription Section: This section provides the prospective investor with the instructions on how to participate in the offering.

• Appendices: The appendices will vary from deal to deal, and should consist of supplemental information and documents that may be material to an investor’s investment decision. Items that may be part of the appendices include the letter of intent, audited financial statements, shareholder’s agreement, etc.

While all of this seems complicated, you can make it easy on yourself by using a Private Placement Memorandum template. Using a PPM template will ensure that you end up with a professional-looking offering memorandum, while easily saving thousands of dollars.

Regulation D Offering

Under the Securities Act of 1933, any offer to sell securities must either be registered with the SEC or meet an exemption. Regulation D (or Reg D) contains three rules providing exemptions from the registration requirements, allowing some smaller companies to offer and sell their securities without having to register the securities with the SEC. For more information about these exemptions, read our publications on Rules 504, 505, and 506 of Regulation D.

While companies using a Reg D exemption do not have to register their securities and usually do not have to file reports with the SEC, they must file what’s known as a “Form D” after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s executive officers and stock promoters, but contains little other information about the company.

As an investor, if you are thinking about investing in a company that is issuing securities which have not been registered with the SEC, you should access EDGAR Company Search to determine whether the company has filed a Form D. If the company has filed a Form D, you can request a copy. If the company has not filed a Form D, this should alert you that the company might not be in compliance with federal securities laws.

You should always check with your state securities regulator to see if they have more information about the company and the people behind it. Be sure to ask whether your state regulator has cleared the offering for sale in your state. You can get the address and telephone number for your state securities regulator by calling the North American Securities Administrators Association at (202) 737-0900 or by visiting its website. You’ll also find this information in the state government section of your local phone book.

Rule 504

Rule 504 of Regulation D provides an exemption from the registration requirements of the federal securities laws for some companies when they offer and sell up to $1,000,000 of their securities in any 12-month period.

A company can use this exemption so long as it is not a blank check company and does not have to file reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Also, the exemption generally does not allow companies to solicit or advertise their securities to the public, and purchasers receive “restricted” securities, meaning that they may not sell the securities without registration or an applicable exemption.

Rule 504 does allow companies to sell securities that are not restricted, if one of the following circumstances is met:

  • The company registers the offering exclusively in one or more states that require a publicly filed registration statement and delivery of a substantive disclosure document to investors;
  • A company registers and sells the offering in a state that requires registration and disclosure delivery and also sells in a state without those requirements, so long as the company delivers the disclosure documents required by the state where the company registered the offering to all purchasers (including those in the state that has no such requirements); or
  • The company sells exclusively according to state law exemptions that permit general solicitation and advertising, so long as the company sells only to “accredited investors.”

Even if a company makes a private sale where there are no specific disclosure delivery requirements, a company should take care to provide sufficient information to investors to avoid violating the anti fraud provisions of the securities laws. This means that any information a company provides to investors must be free from false or misleading statements. Similarly, a company should not exclude any information if the omission makes what is provided to investors false or misleading.

While companies using the Rule 504 exemption do not have to register their securities and usually do not have to file reports with the SEC, they must file what is known as a “Form D” after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s owners and stock promoters, but contains little other information about the company.

Rule 505

Rule 505 of Regulation D allows some companies offering their securities to have those securities exempted from the registration requirements of the federal securities laws.

To qualify for this exemption, a company:

  • Can only offer and sell up to $5 million of its securities in any 12-month period;
  • May sell to an unlimited number of “accredited investors” and up to 35 other persons who do not need to satisfy the sophistication or wealth standards associated with other exemptions;
  • Must inform purchasers that they receive “restricted” securities, meaning that the securities cannot be sold for at least a year without registering them; and
  • Cannot use general solicitation or advertising to sell the securities.

Rule 505 allows companies to decide what information to give to accredited investors, so long as it does not violate the antifraud prohibitions of the federal securities laws. But companies must give non-accredited investors disclosure documents that generally are the same as those used in registered offerings. If a company provides information to accredited investors, it must make this information available to non-accredited investors as well. The company must also be available to answer questions by prospective purchasers.

Here are some specifics about the financial statement requirements applicable to this type of offering:

  • Financial statements need to be certified by an independent public accountant;
  • If a company other than a limited partnership cannot obtain audited financial statements without unreasonable effort or expense, only the company’s balance sheet (to be dated within 120 days of the start of the offering) must be audited; and
  • Limited partnerships unable to obtain required financial statements without unreasonable effort or expense may furnish audited financial statements prepared under the federal income tax laws.

While companies using the Rule 505 exemption do not have to register their securities and usually do not have to file reports with the SEC, they must file what is known as a “Form D” after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s owners and stock promoters, but contains little other information about the company.

Rule 506

Rule 506 of Regulation D is considered a “safe harbor” for the private offering exemption of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Companies using the Rule 506 exemption can raise an unlimited amount of money.

A company can be assured it is within the Section 4(2) exemption by satisfying the following standards:

  • The company cannot use general solicitation or advertising to market the securities;
  • The company may sell its securities to an unlimited number of “accredited investors” and up to 35 other purchases. Unlike Rule 505, all non-accredited investors, either alone or with a purchaser representative, must be sophisticated—that is, they must have sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters to make them capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment;
  • Companies must decide what information to give to accredited investors, so long as it does not violate the antifraud prohibitions of the federal securities laws. But companies must give non-accredited investors disclosure documents that are generally the same as those used in registered offerings. If a company provides information to accredited investors, it must make this information available to non-accredited investors as well;
  • The company must be available to answer questions by prospective purchasers;
  • Financial statement requirements are the same as for Rule 505; and
  • Purchasers receive “restricted” securities, meaning that the securities cannot be sold for at least a year without registering them.

While companies using the Rule 506 exemption do not have to register their securities and usually do not have to file reports with the SEC, they must file what is known as a “Form D” after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s owners and stock promoters, but contains little other information about the company.

Warrants

A Warrant, also called a Stock Warrant, is a certificate that entitles the holder (the person to whom the Warrant is issued) to purchase a certain number of shares of common stock, at a stated price, for a specified period of time. Warrants are the equity kicker which investors require to target their expected return Without the warrant, the return would be equal to the interest rate or dividend.

The amount of Warrants offered represents how much equity dilution you are taking, or how much equity you are giving up. The amount of equity you give up is a function of the investor’s expected return, which takes into account the dividend or interest rate, whether the dividend or interest is paid currently or accrued, and the value of the common equity at the end of the investment horizon.

Exercise Price

The exercise price of a warrant is the price at which the warrant holder pays for the common stock. In a private transaction, the exercise price warrant can be set at any price, and is typically set at $0.01 per share. A higher exercise price just means that the investor will require more shares to achieve the targeted return.

Cashless Exercise

A cashless exercise feature is a way to convert the warrant shares into common equity without writing a check. For example, if you have 5,000 penny warrants and the market value of the common equity is $5.00 per share. You would use 10 shares as currency to purchase your 5,000 shares at $0.01 per share, or $50.00. Your net proceeds would then be $24,950, or (5,000 – 10) x $5.00.

Put/Call Feature

Warrants will typically come with a Put/Call feature. The Put feature allows the warrant holder to monetize his investment by forcing the issuer to redeem the warrant. The Call feature allows the issuer to buy the warrant shares away from the warrant holder, which can be useful if the issuer believes that the value of the equity will be greater than it is at the time the Call is exercised.

The right to Put the warrant shares back to the issuer typically becomes available to the warrant holder any time after five years. The Call rights of the issuer will typically become available 12 months later, or after year six in this example if the Call is available after year five.

The Put or Call of a warrant is completed at the market price, which is tricky to say the least for a private company where the common equity is not traded. The Warrant Agreement should have language that either 1) predefines a formula to determine the value of the equity, or 2) provides for a process to determine the value of the equity.

Predefining the value of the warrant is straight forward, the simplest is assigning a multiple to the then-current EBITDA to arrive at an enterprise value. From the enterprise value subtract all debt and preferred stock, and add unrestricted cash to arrive at the equity value. The “exit multiple” is usually the “going-in multiple”. The downside of this methodology is that someone is potentially leaving money on the table; i.e. the company may be worth more or less than the value suggested by the formula.

Providing for a process to value the equity comes down to the hiring of a valuation firm to determine the value of the equity. In the event one of the parties disagrees with the value determined by the valuation firm, the warrant agreement should provide for a resolution that will usually allow for the dissenting party to hire a second valuation firm. If there is still disagreement, then the two valuation firms will hire a third firm with a final value determined by taking the average of all three valuations.